ZEB.TOvsVFV.TO
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 12 distinct risk and return vectors.
ZEB.TO generated a 10-year CAGR of 15.3% (Max Drawdown: 24.2%), while VFV.TO generated 15.0% (Max Drawdown: 18.5%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Low correlation. Holding both provides strong potential diversification benefits.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did ZEB.TO compare to VFV.TO historically?
ZEB.TO and VFV.TO performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of ZEB.TO vs VFV.TO?
Over the 2016–2026 study period, ZEB.TO produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 15.3% while VFV.TO produced 15.0%. A ${10,000} investment in ZEB.TO would have grown to approximately $42,630, compared to $41,272 for VFV.TO.
What is the maximum drawdown of ZEB.TO vs VFV.TO?
ZEB.TO experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 24.2% (2022 was its worst year at -10.4%), versus 18.5% for VFV.TO (worst year 2022 at -12.6%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are ZEB.TO and VFV.TO?
ZEB.TO and VFV.TO have a Pearson return correlation of 58% over the study period. This low correlation means the two ETFs behave quite differently. Combining both could meaningfully reduce portfolio volatility relative to holding either alone.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — ZEB.TO or VFV.TO?
ZEB.TO has a Sharpe ratio of 0.77 versus 0.90 for VFV.TO. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. VFV.TO delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. ZEB.TO had annualized volatility of 16.3% vs 12.8% for VFV.TO.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — ZEB.TO or VFV.TO?
ZEB.TO has a dividend yield of 2.82%, while VFV.TO yields 0.00%. On a $10,000 investment, ZEB.TO paid approximately $191 in cumulative income vs $1,711 for VFV.TO over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with ZEB.TO or VFV.TO
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest