VUSA.LSEvsVUAA.LSE
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 10 distinct risk and return vectors.
VUSA.LSE generated a 10-year CAGR of 14.7% (Max Drawdown: 15.7%), while VUAA.LSE generated 15.9% (Max Drawdown: 22.4%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Moderately correlated. They share macro drivers but offer identifiable divergence.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did VUSA.LSE compare to VUAA.LSE historically?
VUSA.LSE and VUAA.LSE performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of VUSA.LSE vs VUAA.LSE?
Over the 2019–2026 study period, VUSA.LSE produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 14.7% while VUAA.LSE produced 15.9%. A ${10,000} investment in VUSA.LSE would have grown to approximately $25,864, compared to $27,734 for VUAA.LSE.
What is the maximum drawdown of VUSA.LSE vs VUAA.LSE?
VUSA.LSE experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 15.7% (2022 was its worst year at -9.0%), versus 22.4% for VUAA.LSE (worst year 2022 at -18.6%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are VUSA.LSE and VUAA.LSE?
VUSA.LSE and VUAA.LSE have a Pearson return correlation of 86% over the study period. This moderate correlation means the ETFs share broad market drivers but show identifiable divergence, offering some diversification benefit when combined.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — VUSA.LSE or VUAA.LSE?
VUSA.LSE has a Sharpe ratio of 0.83 versus 0.82 for VUAA.LSE. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. VUSA.LSE delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. VUSA.LSE had annualized volatility of 13.5% vs 15.6% for VUAA.LSE.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — VUSA.LSE or VUAA.LSE?
VUSA.LSE has a dividend yield of 1.82%, while VUAA.LSE yields 0.46%. On a $10,000 investment, VUSA.LSE paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $0 for VUAA.LSE over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with VUSA.LSE or VUAA.LSE
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest