VFV.TOvsXSP.TO
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 11 distinct risk and return vectors.
VFV.TO generated a 10-year CAGR of 15.0% (Max Drawdown: 18.5%), while XSP.TO generated 13.1% (Max Drawdown: 24.9%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Highly correlated. Moving almost perfectly in tandem, providing minimal diversification benefit when held together.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did VFV.TO compare to XSP.TO historically?
VFV.TO and XSP.TO performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of VFV.TO vs XSP.TO?
Over the 2016–2026 study period, VFV.TO produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 15.0% while XSP.TO produced 13.1%. A ${10,000} investment in VFV.TO would have grown to approximately $41,272, compared to $34,742 for XSP.TO.
What is the maximum drawdown of VFV.TO vs XSP.TO?
VFV.TO experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 18.5% (2022 was its worst year at -12.6%), versus 24.9% for XSP.TO (worst year 2022 at -19.3%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are VFV.TO and XSP.TO?
VFV.TO and XSP.TO have a Pearson return correlation of 90% over the study period. This very high correlation means the two ETFs move almost in lockstep. Holding both in the same portfolio provides minimal diversification benefit — you're largely doubling exposure to the same risk factors.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — VFV.TO or XSP.TO?
VFV.TO has a Sharpe ratio of 0.90 versus 0.66 for XSP.TO. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. VFV.TO delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. VFV.TO had annualized volatility of 12.8% vs 15.2% for XSP.TO.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — VFV.TO or XSP.TO?
VFV.TO has a dividend yield of 0.00%, while XSP.TO yields 0.00%. On a $10,000 investment, VFV.TO paid approximately $1,711 in cumulative income vs $0 for XSP.TO over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with VFV.TO or XSP.TO
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest