TIPS.USvsTIP.US

10-Year Study

The Verdict

Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, TIP.US historically led across 11 distinct risk and return vectors.
TIPS.US generated a 10-year CAGR of 0.0% (Max Drawdown: 100.0%), while TIP.US generated 1.9% (Max Drawdown: 13.9%).

TIPS.US
4
metric wins
0.0% CAGR
VS
TIP.US
7
metric wins
1.9% CAGR
TIP.US led on more metrics

Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.

10Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
+0.0%
VS
TIP.US
+1.9%
5Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
-72.2%
VS
TIP.US
-0.7%
3Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
-85.5%
VS
TIP.US
+3.3%
1Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
-99.7%
VS
TIP.US
-4.5%
Max DrawdownMax DrawdownThe largest peak-to-trough decline in the asset's value over the measurement period.Click for full definition →
lower is better
TIPS.US
-100.0%
VS
TIP.US
-13.9%
Sharpe RatioSharpe RatioRisk-adjusted return: how much excess return you earn per unit of total risk (volatility).Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
899.23
VS
TIP.US
-0.50
Sortino RatioSortino RatioLike Sharpe, but only penalizes downside volatility — a more accurate risk measure for asymmetric return distributions.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
32956.83
VS
TIP.US
-0.67
Ann. VolatilityAnnualized VolatilityThe annualized standard deviation of an asset's returns — a measure of how much prices fluctuate.Click for full definition →
lower is better
TIPS.US
+3298.6%
VS
TIP.US
+5.0%
% Positive Years% Positive YearsThe percentage of calendar years in the measurement period where the asset delivered a positive return.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
+30.0%
VS
TIP.US
+70.0%
Dividend YieldDividend YieldAnnual dividend paid per share divided by the current share price — expressed as a percentage income return.Click for full definition →
TIPS.US
+0.0%
VS
TIP.US
+5.0%
10Y Income ($10k)
TIPS.US
$0
VS
TIP.US
$418
BetaBetaA measure of an asset's sensitivity to broad market movements relative to a benchmark (e.g. S&P 500).Click for full definition →
lower = less market sensitivity
TIPS.US
-6.74
VS
TIP.US
0.68

TIPS.US vs TIP.US: In-Depth AnalysisiData-driven narrative breakdown of volatility, sector exposure, and income characteristics.

Volatility & Variance: Reading the Risk Fingerprint

TIPS.US (Tianrong Internet Products and Services Inc) carries an annualised volatility of 3298.6%, categorised as high relative to the long-run US equity benchmark of approximately 15%. TIP.US (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) registers at 5.0%, a low reading by the same standard.

TIPS.US carries meaningfully higher annualised volatility than TIP.US — a 3293.6% gap that, under normal return distributions, implies a wider range of year-over-year outcomes and a greater likelihood of a 20%-or-more drawdown in any given calendar year.

On the downside, TIPS.US's maximum peak-to-trough drawdown of 100.0% represents a catastrophic peak-to-trough collapse over the study period. TIP.US's worst drawdown of 13.9% was a notable pullback. TIP.US demonstrated stronger capital preservation characteristics, absorbing market shocks with less peak-to-trough damage.

When evaluating these two funds for a US-domiciled portfolio, it is important to consider that volatility and drawdown metrics are calculated on trailing historical data. Past standard deviations do not guarantee future behaviour, particularly around US Federal Reserve policy shifts, which have historically been the primary driver of cross-asset correlation breakdowns.

US Market Sector Exposure & Concentration Risk

TIPS.US is positioned primarily within Specialty Industrial Machinery. TIP.US's exposure tilts toward US Equity. This sector divergence is one of the key structural drivers of the return and risk differences observed between the two funds over the study window.

For US investors building a diversified portfolio, the sector overlap — or lack thereof — between these two funds directly affects the marginal diversification benefit of holding both. The distinct sector exposures mean that a combined allocation to both funds would offer broader US market coverage than either fund alone, potentially smoothing return volatility during sector-specific downturns.

Sector concentration is particularly consequential in the US equity market, where the top five S&P 500 holdings — Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), Amazon (AMZN), and Alphabet (GOOGL) — have at times represented over 25% of the total index by market capitalisation. Funds with heavy US Technology exposure amplify this mega-cap concentration risk, while broader market or equal-weight funds dilute it.

Dividend Yield, Income Generation & US Tax Considerations

TIPS.US currently yields 0.00% annually, while TIP.US yields 4.98%. On a $10,000 initial investment held over the study period, TIPS.US generated approximately $0 in cumulative income distributions versus $418 for TIP.US — a gap of $418 in favour of TIP.US.

For US taxable account holders, the character of dividend distributions matters as much as the yield itself. Qualified dividends — those from US corporations held longer than the required 60-day holding period — are taxed at preferential long-term capital gains rates (0%, 15%, or 20% depending on income bracket). Non-qualified or ordinary dividends are taxed as ordinary income, which can reach 37% for high earners. US investors should consult their own tax advisors to understand which distribution category applies to each fund's payout history.

Income-focused US investors — particularly those using tax-advantaged accounts such as a 401(k), IRA, or Roth IRA — can compound dividend distributions without immediate tax drag. In a taxable brokerage account, a higher-yielding fund may generate less after-tax wealth than a lower-yielding fund with equivalent total return, depending on the investor's marginal tax rate. The total return (price appreciation plus reinvested dividends) is generally the more complete measure of long-term performance.

TIP.US's higher yield of 4.98% may offer more immediate income utility for US investors prioritising cash flow, though TIPS.US's lower yield may reflect greater internal reinvestment and growth orientation within its underlying holdings.

Historical Trajectory

Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years

Annual Returns Comparison

Performance Consistency

Rolling 12-Month Returns

Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.

Proprietary StressScore™= round((Annualised Volatility × 0.5 + |Max Drawdown| × 0.5) × 100)

1699/100
TIPS.US
Extreme Stress
Vol
3298.6%
MDD
-100.0%
9/100
TIP.US
Low Stress
Vol
5.0%
MDD
-13.9%

Historical Drawdowns

Return Correlation

2%
Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Low correlation. Holding both provides strong potential diversification benefits.

Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping

TIPS.US Factor Exposure
View full factor risk breakdown
FactorRisk Exposure
VTI.US6.9%
VEA.US0.9%
VWO.US0.3%
QQQ.US1.2%
VTV.US0.4%
IJR.US0.5%
QUAL.US2.8%
SHV.US73.4%
TLT.US0.0%
LQD.US-0.0%
HYG.US0.2%
GLD.US0.4%
USO.US1.2%
VNQ.US0.4%
BTC-USD.CC0.0%
CPER.US-0.0%
VIX.INDX1.0%
UUP.US1.2%
TIP.US0.7%
Idiosyncratic8.5%
TIP.US Factor Exposure
View full factor risk breakdown
FactorRisk Exposure
VTI.US-0.0%
VEA.US-0.0%
VWO.US-0.0%
QQQ.US0.0%
VTV.US0.0%
IJR.US-0.0%
QUAL.US-0.0%
SHV.US0.0%
TLT.US0.0%
LQD.US0.0%
HYG.US-0.0%
GLD.US0.0%
USO.US-0.0%
VNQ.US0.0%
BTC-USD.CC0.0%
CPER.US0.0%
VIX.INDX-0.0%
UUP.US-0.0%
TIP.US100.0%
Idiosyncratic0.0%

TIPS.US vs TIP.US: Asset Structure & Fundamentals

Side-by-side metric evaluation across valuation, profitability, fees, structure, and balance-sheet health.

Metric
TIPS.US
TIP.US
Fund Structure & Fees
Expense Ratio
N/A — Applies to funds
0.19%
Assets Under Management (AUM)
$14.9B
Holdings Count
N/A — Operating Stock
6
Valuation Multiples
P/E Ratio (Stock / ETF Basket)
Price-to-Sales (P/S)
Price-to-Book (P/B)
Dividend Yield
Annual Dividend Yield
0.0%
5.0%
Stock Profitability & Growth
Operating Margin
0.0%
N/A — Applies to companies
Gross Margin
N/A — Applies to companies
Return on Equity (ROE)
0.0%
N/A — Applies to companies
Revenue Growth (YoY)
0.0%
N/A — Applies to companies
Debt-to-Equity
N/A — Applies to companies
Current Ratio
1.26x
N/A — Applies to companies
Market Sentiment
Short Squeeze Risk
Low
Low

Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.

50-Day SMA

TIPS.US-54.5%
TIP.US-1.4%

200-Day SMA

TIPS.US-98.1%
TIP.US-3.5%

Beta (Market Risk)

TIPS.US-6.74
TIP.US0.68

Trend SignalGolden Cross & Death CrossTechnical chart patterns that occur when a short-term moving average crosses over a long-term moving average.Click for full definition →

TIPS.US
DEATH CROSS
TIP.US
DEATH CROSS

RSI (14-Day)Relative Strength Index (RSI)A momentum oscillator that measures the speed and change of price movements to identify overbought or oversold conditions.Click for full definition →

TIPS.US
33
Neutral
TIP.US
24
Oversold

Frequently Asked Questions

How did TIPS.US compare to TIP.US historically?

TIP.US (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) led across 11 measured metrics over the 20162026 study window, including higher risk-adjusted returns. That said, TIPS.US may appeal to investors prioritizing higher growth with more volatility tolerance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the 10-year CAGR of TIPS.US vs TIP.US?

Over the 20162026 study period, TIPS.US produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 0.0% while TIP.US produced 1.9%. A ${10,000} investment in TIPS.US would have grown to approximately $10,000, compared to $12,020 for TIP.US.

What is the maximum drawdown of TIPS.US vs TIP.US?

TIPS.US experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 100.0% (2026 was its worst year at -99.3%), versus 13.9% for TIP.US (worst year 2022 at -12.3%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.

How correlated are TIPS.US and TIP.US?

TIPS.US and TIP.US have a Pearson return correlation of 2% over the study period. This low correlation means the two ETFs behave quite differently. Combining both could meaningfully reduce portfolio volatility relative to holding either alone.

Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — TIPS.US or TIP.US?

TIPS.US has a Sharpe ratio of 899.23 versus -0.50 for TIP.US. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. TIPS.US delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. TIPS.US had annualized volatility of 3298.6% vs 5.0% for TIP.US.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend — TIPS.US or TIP.US?

TIPS.US has a dividend yield of 0.00%, while TIP.US yields 4.98%. On a $10,000 investment, TIPS.US paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $418 for TIP.US over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.

Popular ETF Comparisons

Build a Portfolio with TIPS.US or TIP.US

Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.

Run a Custom Backtest