SXR8.XETRAvsXDWD.XETRA

10-Year Study
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)()
db x-trackers MSCI World Index UCITS DR 1C()

The Verdict

Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 9 distinct risk and return vectors.
SXR8.XETRA generated a 10-year CAGR of 13.9% (Max Drawdown: 17.6%), while XDWD.XETRA generated 12.0% (Max Drawdown: 18.7%).

SXR8.XETRA
5
metric wins
13.9% CAGR
VS
XDWD.XETRA
4
metric wins
12.0% CAGR
Tied — very close race

Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.

10Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
+13.9%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+12.0%
5Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
+13.3%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+11.8%
3Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
+16.9%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+16.2%
1Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
+17.6%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+17.7%
Max DrawdownMax DrawdownThe largest peak-to-trough decline in the asset's value over the measurement period.Click for full definition →
lower is better
SXR8.XETRA
-17.6%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
-18.7%
Sharpe RatioSharpe RatioRisk-adjusted return: how much excess return you earn per unit of total risk (volatility).Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
0.76
VS
XDWD.XETRA
0.66
Sortino RatioSortino RatioLike Sharpe, but only penalizes downside volatility — a more accurate risk measure for asymmetric return distributions.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
1.18
VS
XDWD.XETRA
0.93
Ann. VolatilityAnnualized VolatilityThe annualized standard deviation of an asset's returns — a measure of how much prices fluctuate.Click for full definition →
lower is better
SXR8.XETRA
+14.2%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+13.1%
% Positive Years% Positive YearsThe percentage of calendar years in the measurement period where the asset delivered a positive return.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
+80.0%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+80.0%
Dividend YieldDividend YieldAnnual dividend paid per share divided by the current share price — expressed as a percentage income return.Click for full definition →
SXR8.XETRA
+0.0%
VS
XDWD.XETRA
+2.5%
10Y Income ($10k)
SXR8.XETRA
$0
VS
XDWD.XETRA
$0
BetaBetaA measure of an asset's sensitivity to broad market movements relative to a benchmark (e.g. S&P 500).Click for full definition →
lower = less market sensitivity
SXR8.XETRA
1.00
VS
XDWD.XETRA
1.00

Historical Trajectory

Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years

Annual Returns Comparison

Performance Consistency

Rolling 12-Month Returns

Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.

Historical Drawdowns

Return Correlation

98%
Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Highly correlated. Moving almost perfectly in tandem, providing minimal diversification benefit when held together.

Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping

SXR8.XETRA Factor Exposure
XDWD.XETRA Factor Exposure

Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.

Fundamentals Radar

Valuation & Quality Matrix

P/E Ratio
20.6
20.3
Piotroski F-ScorePiotroski F-ScoreA 9-point scoring system evaluating a company's financial strength across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.Click for full definition →
0
0
Altman Z-ScoreAltman Z-ScoreA bankruptcy prediction model that combines 5 financial ratios into a single score indicating financial distress risk.Click for full definition →
1.3
1.3
Market Cap
$404.5B
$240.7B

10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)

Dividend YieldDividend YieldAnnual dividend paid per share divided by the current share price — expressed as a percentage income return.Click for full definition →
0.0%
2.5%
Total Income Gen
$0
$0

Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.

50-Day SMA

SXR8.XETRA+3.3%
XDWD.XETRA+2.9%

200-Day SMA

SXR8.XETRA+4.9%
XDWD.XETRA+5.8%

Beta (Market Risk)

SXR8.XETRA1.00
XDWD.XETRA1.00

Frequently Asked Questions

How did SXR8.XETRA compare to XDWD.XETRA historically?

SXR8.XETRA and XDWD.XETRA performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.

What is the 10-year CAGR of SXR8.XETRA vs XDWD.XETRA?

Over the 2016–2026 study period, SXR8.XETRA produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 13.9% while XDWD.XETRA produced 12.0%. A ${10,000} investment in SXR8.XETRA would have grown to approximately $37,927, compared to $31,956 for XDWD.XETRA.

What is the maximum drawdown of SXR8.XETRA vs XDWD.XETRA?

SXR8.XETRA experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 17.6% (2022 was its worst year at -14.3%), versus 18.7% for XDWD.XETRA (worst year 2022 at -13.7%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.

How correlated are SXR8.XETRA and XDWD.XETRA?

SXR8.XETRA and XDWD.XETRA have a Pearson return correlation of 98% over the study period. This very high correlation means the two ETFs move almost in lockstep. Holding both in the same portfolio provides minimal diversification benefit — you're largely doubling exposure to the same risk factors.

Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — SXR8.XETRA or XDWD.XETRA?

SXR8.XETRA has a Sharpe ratio of 0.76 versus 0.66 for XDWD.XETRA. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. SXR8.XETRA delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. SXR8.XETRA had annualized volatility of 14.2% vs 13.1% for XDWD.XETRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend — SXR8.XETRA or XDWD.XETRA?

SXR8.XETRA has a dividend yield of 0.00%, while XDWD.XETRA yields 2.49%. On a $10,000 investment, SXR8.XETRA paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $0 for XDWD.XETRA over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.

Build a Portfolio with SXR8.XETRA or XDWD.XETRA

Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.

Run a Custom Backtest