MEUD.PAvsSXR8.XETRA
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 10 distinct risk and return vectors.
MEUD.PA generated a 10-year CAGR of 8.9% (Max Drawdown: 22.2%), while SXR8.XETRA generated 13.9% (Max Drawdown: 17.6%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Moderately correlated. They share macro drivers but offer identifiable divergence.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did MEUD.PA compare to SXR8.XETRA historically?
MEUD.PA and SXR8.XETRA performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of MEUD.PA vs SXR8.XETRA?
Over the 2016–2026 study period, MEUD.PA produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 8.9% while SXR8.XETRA produced 13.9%. A ${10,000} investment in MEUD.PA would have grown to approximately $24,120, compared to $37,927 for SXR8.XETRA.
What is the maximum drawdown of MEUD.PA vs SXR8.XETRA?
MEUD.PA experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 22.2% (2022 was its worst year at -10.2%), versus 17.6% for SXR8.XETRA (worst year 2022 at -14.3%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are MEUD.PA and SXR8.XETRA?
MEUD.PA and SXR8.XETRA have a Pearson return correlation of 69% over the study period. This moderate correlation means the ETFs share broad market drivers but show identifiable divergence, offering some diversification benefit when combined.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — MEUD.PA or SXR8.XETRA?
MEUD.PA has a Sharpe ratio of 0.42 versus 0.76 for SXR8.XETRA. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. SXR8.XETRA delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. MEUD.PA had annualized volatility of 13.3% vs 14.2% for SXR8.XETRA.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — MEUD.PA or SXR8.XETRA?
MEUD.PA has a dividend yield of 0.00%, while SXR8.XETRA yields 0.00%. On a $10,000 investment, MEUD.PA paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $0 for SXR8.XETRA over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with MEUD.PA or SXR8.XETRA
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest