LQD.USvsHYG.US

10-Year Study
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF()
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF()

The Verdict

Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 12 distinct risk and return vectors.
LQD.US generated a 10-year CAGR of 2.6% (Max Drawdown: 23.3%), while HYG.US generated 4.9% (Max Drawdown: 15.2%).

LQD.US
2
metric wins
2.6% CAGR
VS
HYG.US
10
metric wins
4.9% CAGR
Tied — very close race

Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.

10Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
+2.6%
VS
HYG.US
+4.9%
5Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
-0.1%
VS
HYG.US
+3.7%
3Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
+4.8%
VS
HYG.US
+8.7%
1Y CAGRCAGRCompound Annual Growth Rate — the annualized rate of return over a period, accounting for compounding.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
+5.5%
VS
HYG.US
+6.0%
Max DrawdownMax DrawdownThe largest peak-to-trough decline in the asset's value over the measurement period.Click for full definition →
lower is better
LQD.US
-23.3%
VS
HYG.US
-15.2%
Sharpe RatioSharpe RatioRisk-adjusted return: how much excess return you earn per unit of total risk (volatility).Click for full definition →
LQD.US
-0.18
VS
HYG.US
0.13
Sortino RatioSortino RatioLike Sharpe, but only penalizes downside volatility — a more accurate risk measure for asymmetric return distributions.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
-0.26
VS
HYG.US
0.14
Ann. VolatilityAnnualized VolatilityThe annualized standard deviation of an asset's returns — a measure of how much prices fluctuate.Click for full definition →
lower is better
LQD.US
+8.3%
VS
HYG.US
+7.4%
% Positive Years% Positive YearsThe percentage of calendar years in the measurement period where the asset delivered a positive return.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
+60.0%
VS
HYG.US
+80.0%
Dividend YieldDividend YieldAnnual dividend paid per share divided by the current share price — expressed as a percentage income return.Click for full definition →
LQD.US
+4.4%
VS
HYG.US
+0.0%
10Y Income ($10k)
LQD.US
$100
VS
HYG.US
$159
BetaBetaA measure of an asset's sensitivity to broad market movements relative to a benchmark (e.g. S&P 500).Click for full definition →
lower = less market sensitivity
LQD.US
1.35
VS
HYG.US
0.64

Historical Trajectory

Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years

Annual Returns Comparison

Performance Consistency

Rolling 12-Month Returns

Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.

Historical Drawdowns

Return Correlation

78%
Pearson Correlation Coefficient

Moderately correlated. They share macro drivers but offer identifiable divergence.

Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping

LQD.US Factor Exposure
HYG.US Factor Exposure

Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.

Fundamentals Radar

Valuation & Quality Matrix

P/E Ratio
0.0
0.0
Piotroski F-ScorePiotroski F-ScoreA 9-point scoring system evaluating a company's financial strength across profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency.Click for full definition →
0
0
Altman Z-ScoreAltman Z-ScoreA bankruptcy prediction model that combines 5 financial ratios into a single score indicating financial distress risk.Click for full definition →
1.3
1.3
Market Cap
$87.6B
$0

10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)

Dividend YieldDividend YieldAnnual dividend paid per share divided by the current share price — expressed as a percentage income return.Click for full definition →
4.4%
0.0%
Total Income Gen
$100
$159

Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.

50-Day SMA

LQD.US-0.4%
HYG.US+0.4%

200-Day SMA

LQD.US+0.2%
HYG.US+1.2%

Beta (Market Risk)

LQD.US1.35
HYG.US0.64

Frequently Asked Questions

How did LQD.US compare to HYG.US historically?

LQD.US and HYG.US performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.

What is the 10-year CAGR of LQD.US vs HYG.US?

Over the 2016–2026 study period, LQD.US produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 2.6% while HYG.US produced 4.9%. A ${10,000} investment in LQD.US would have grown to approximately $12,996, compared to $16,595 for HYG.US.

What is the maximum drawdown of LQD.US vs HYG.US?

LQD.US experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 23.3% (2022 was its worst year at -17.9%), versus 15.2% for HYG.US (worst year 2022 at -11.0%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.

How correlated are LQD.US and HYG.US?

LQD.US and HYG.US have a Pearson return correlation of 78% over the study period. This moderate correlation means the ETFs share broad market drivers but show identifiable divergence, offering some diversification benefit when combined.

Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — LQD.US or HYG.US?

LQD.US has a Sharpe ratio of -0.18 versus 0.13 for HYG.US. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. HYG.US delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. LQD.US had annualized volatility of 8.3% vs 7.4% for HYG.US.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend — LQD.US or HYG.US?

LQD.US has a dividend yield of 4.44%, while HYG.US yields 0.00%. On a $10,000 investment, LQD.US paid approximately $100 in cumulative income vs $159 for HYG.US over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.

Build a Portfolio with LQD.US or HYG.US

Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.

Run a Custom Backtest