IWDA.LSEvsVWRL.LSE
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 10 distinct risk and return vectors.
IWDA.LSE generated a 10-year CAGR of 12.8% (Max Drawdown: 24.1%), while VWRL.LSE generated 13.1% (Max Drawdown: 15.5%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Moderately correlated. They share macro drivers but offer identifiable divergence.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did IWDA.LSE compare to VWRL.LSE historically?
IWDA.LSE and VWRL.LSE performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of IWDA.LSE vs VWRL.LSE?
Over the 2016–2026 study period, IWDA.LSE produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 12.8% while VWRL.LSE produced 13.1%. A ${10,000} investment in IWDA.LSE would have grown to approximately $33,601, compared to $33,989 for VWRL.LSE.
What is the maximum drawdown of IWDA.LSE vs VWRL.LSE?
IWDA.LSE experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 24.1% (2022 was its worst year at -18.1%), versus 15.5% for VWRL.LSE (worst year 2022 at -8.4%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are IWDA.LSE and VWRL.LSE?
IWDA.LSE and VWRL.LSE have a Pearson return correlation of 80% over the study period. This moderate correlation means the ETFs share broad market drivers but show identifiable divergence, offering some diversification benefit when combined.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — IWDA.LSE or VWRL.LSE?
IWDA.LSE has a Sharpe ratio of 0.66 versus 0.79 for VWRL.LSE. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. VWRL.LSE delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. IWDA.LSE had annualized volatility of 14.1% vs 11.7% for VWRL.LSE.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — IWDA.LSE or VWRL.LSE?
IWDA.LSE has a dividend yield of 0.00%, while VWRL.LSE yields 2.61%. On a $10,000 investment, IWDA.LSE paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $89 for VWRL.LSE over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with IWDA.LSE or VWRL.LSE
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest