GLD.USvsSLV.US
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 9 distinct risk and return vectors.
GLD.US generated a 10-year CAGR of 14.4% (Max Drawdown: 18.1%), while SLV.US generated 16.9% (Max Drawdown: 36.8%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Moderately correlated. They share macro drivers but offer identifiable divergence.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did GLD.US compare to SLV.US historically?
GLD.US and SLV.US performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of GLD.US vs SLV.US?
Over the 2016–2026 study period, GLD.US produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 14.4% while SLV.US produced 16.9%. A ${10,000} investment in GLD.US would have grown to approximately $37,409, compared to $48,529 for SLV.US.
What is the maximum drawdown of GLD.US vs SLV.US?
GLD.US experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 18.1% (2021 was its worst year at -4.1%), versus 36.8% for SLV.US (worst year 2021 at -12.5%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are GLD.US and SLV.US?
GLD.US and SLV.US have a Pearson return correlation of 76% over the study period. This moderate correlation means the ETFs share broad market drivers but show identifiable divergence, offering some diversification benefit when combined.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — GLD.US or SLV.US?
GLD.US has a Sharpe ratio of 0.72 versus 0.58 for SLV.US. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. GLD.US delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. GLD.US had annualized volatility of 14.9% vs 29.9% for SLV.US.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — GLD.US or SLV.US?
GLD.US has a dividend yield of 0.00%, while SLV.US yields 0.00%. On a $10,000 investment, GLD.US paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $0 for SLV.US over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with GLD.US or SLV.US
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest