EWZ.USvsEEM.US
10-Year StudyThe Verdict
Over the synchronized 10-year period measured, neither historically led across 11 distinct risk and return vectors.
EWZ.US generated a 10-year CAGR of 10.6% (Max Drawdown: 50.3%), while EEM.US generated 9.0% (Max Drawdown: 36.5%).
Head-to-Head StatisticsiDetailed side-by-side breakdown of return and risk metrics.
Historical Trajectory
Growth of $10,000 Over 10 Years
Annual Returns Comparison
Performance Consistency
Rolling 12-Month Returns
Risk & Factor X-Ray AnalysisiAnalyzes downside volatility and macro factor exposures.
Historical Drawdowns
Return Correlation
Low correlation. Holding both provides strong potential diversification benefits.
Risk X-Ray Macro Factor Exposure Mapping
Fundamentals, Quality & IncomeiSide-by-side fundamental valuation, corporate health, and 10-year income generation.
Fundamentals Radar
Valuation & Quality Matrix
10-Year Income Simulation ($10k)
Momentum & Macro PositioningiCompares relative price trends, moving averages, and market sensitivity.
50-Day SMA
200-Day SMA
Beta (Market Risk)
Frequently Asked Questions
How did EWZ.US compare to EEM.US historically?
EWZ.US and EEM.US performed comparably over the measured period. Neither clearly dominated across all risk and return metrics. The right choice depends on your individual investment goals, income needs, and risk tolerance.
What is the 10-year CAGR of EWZ.US vs EEM.US?
Over the 2016–2026 study period, EWZ.US produced an annualized return (CAGR) of 10.6% while EEM.US produced 9.0%. A ${10,000} investment in EWZ.US would have grown to approximately $26,328, compared to $22,761 for EEM.US.
What is the maximum drawdown of EWZ.US vs EEM.US?
EWZ.US experienced a peak-to-trough drawdown of 50.3% (2024 was its worst year at -30.4%), versus 36.5% for EEM.US (worst year 2022 at -20.6%). A smaller maximum drawdown indicates lower downside risk and is particularly important for investors close to or in retirement.
How correlated are EWZ.US and EEM.US?
EWZ.US and EEM.US have a Pearson return correlation of 57% over the study period. This low correlation means the two ETFs behave quite differently. Combining both could meaningfully reduce portfolio volatility relative to holding either alone.
Which ETF has a better Sharpe ratio — EWZ.US or EEM.US?
EWZ.US has a Sharpe ratio of 0.36 versus 0.33 for EEM.US. The Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility) relative to a risk-free rate. EWZ.US delivered better risk-adjusted returns over the study period. EWZ.US had annualized volatility of 31.6% vs 16.8% for EEM.US.
Which ETF pays a higher dividend — EWZ.US or EEM.US?
EWZ.US has a dividend yield of 4.26%, while EEM.US yields 0.00%. On a $10,000 investment, EWZ.US paid approximately $0 in cumulative income vs $0 for EEM.US over the study period. Income-focused investors should weigh dividend yield alongside total return (price appreciation + dividends), since a lower-yielding ETF can still produce superior total returns through capital gains.
Build a Portfolio with EWZ.US or EEM.US
Want to see how exactly these ETFs impact your actual portfolio? Run a Monte Carlo simulation or DCA backtest instantly on StressTest.pro.
Run a Custom Backtest